On 31/03/2015 at 09:47:15 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote :

quoted

Are you absolutely sure that the exynos3250 IP is the same as the
s3c6410 (I don't know much about the exynos family). The concern being
that if at one point you have an errata on one or ther other, you will
have to break the DT ABI by undoing this change.

Note that I'm fine with it, I'm just asking.

I'm sure about exynos3250 RTC is same with S3C6410 RTC.
There was little different about that pevious S3C6410 RTC
don't consider to control the 'rtc_src' clk.


But, Javier's patch[1] add the '.needs_src_clk' to control the
'rtc_src' clk. After merged this patch, there is no different part between
Exynos3250 RTC and S3C6410 RTC.

[1] 8792f7772f4f (drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c: add .needs_src_clk to s3c6410 RTC data)

Yes, I saw that the software was handling both the same way, I was
asking about the hardware side.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.