On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:

Johan, let me know if this version addresses part of your concerns.

Looks good to me. I just have a few minor comments on two of the patches.

I'm open to any suggestion/rework to address other previously discussed
issues, as long as it does not end up in a dead-end (like the discussion
you had last year):
 - the fact that the RTT block could be used for something that is not
   an RTC
 - the fact that referencing the GPBR node and defining a GPBR register
   number to store RTC time info could be considered as an HW config and
   not an HW description and thus should not be described in the DT

No doubt.

 - other things I don't remember :-)

Thanks,
Johan