Re: [PATCH V3 13/19] rtla: Add Documentation

Daniel Bristot de Oliveira [off-list ref] writes:

Adds the basis for rtla documentation. It is based on libtracefs
Documentation as suggested by Steven Rostedt. This patch also
includes the rtla(1) man page.

Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <redacted>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
---
 tools/tracing/rtla/Documentation/Makefile     | 223 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../tracing/rtla/Documentation/asciidoc.conf  | 118 +++++++++
 .../rtla/Documentation/manpage-base.xsl       |  35 +++
 .../rtla/Documentation/manpage-normal.xsl     |  13 +
 tools/tracing/rtla/Documentation/rtla.txt     |  56 +++++
 tools/tracing/rtla/Documentation/utils.mk     | 144 +++++++++++
 tools/tracing/rtla/Makefile                   |  20 +-
 7 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rtla/Documentation/Makefile
 create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rtla/Documentation/asciidoc.conf
 create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rtla/Documentation/manpage-base.xsl
 create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rtla/Documentation/manpage-normal.xsl
 create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rtla/Documentation/rtla.txt
 create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rtla/Documentation/utils.mk

So please forgive me for being obnoxious but I have to ask...do we
*really* need to add yet another markup language and docs build
infrastructure to the kernel?  I'm glad to see documentation, of course,
but I would be gladder if it weren't a silo completely separate from the
rest of the kernel docs.  Is there a reason why this couldn't have been
done with Sphinx?

Thanks,

jon