On Thu, 2021-08-19 at 11:20 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 05:47:08PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
quoted
On 2021-08-19 17:39:29 [+0200], To Paul E. McKenney wrote:
quoted
+ /*
+ * Ideally these sequences would be detected in debug builds
+ * (regardless of RT), but until then don't stop testing
+ * them on non-RT.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) {
+ /*
+ * Can't release the outermost rcu lock in an irq disabled
+ * section without preemption also being disabled, if irqs
+ * had ever been enabled during this RCU critical section
+ * (could leak a special flag and delay reporting the qs).
+ */
+ if ((oldmask & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU) &&
+ (mask & RCUTORTURE_RDR_IRQ) &&
+ !(mask & preempts))
+ mask |= RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU;
This piece above, I don't understand. I had it running for a while and
it didn't explode. Let me try TREE01 for 30min without that piece.
This might be historical. There was a time when interrupts being
disabled across rcu_read_unlock() meant that preemption had to have
been disabled across the entire RCU read-side critical section.
I am not seeing a purpose for it now, but I could easily be missing
something, especially given my tenuous grasp of RT.
Yeah, I think this was to deal with not having the irq work stuff in RT
at the time.
-Scott