Thread (30 messages) flat view 30 messages, 6 authors, 2021-08-10

Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt4

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2021-08-04 17:02:07
Also in: lkml

On 2021-08-04 10:57:11 [-0600], Jens Axboe wrote:
quoted
The spin_lock_irq() vs local_irq_disable() + spin_lock() is documented
in Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst.
That said I have no problem by carrying that patch in the RT-patchset
and revisit it later.
Right, I suspect that was added as a pre RT patch dump at some point.
It's a newer thing. Is it actually possible to set PREEMPT_RT in the
mainline kernel? Looks like it depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT and nobody
sets that.
Yes. It is upstream now. The documentation and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT symbol.
The Kconfig symbol has already users outside of the -RT patch.

You can't enable it yet since we require a few things which are on their
way.

Having the symbol and the documentation helped to convince some people
:) 
So I agree that just carrying your solution in the RT patchset is fine
for now, we can revisit later.
Okay.

Sebastian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help