Re: [rfc/patch] mm/slub: restore/expand unfreeze_partials() local exclusion scope
From: Mike Galbraith <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-29 04:52:00
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 18:59 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 7/27/21 6:09 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2021-07-26 at 23:26 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:quoted
On 7/26/21 7:00 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:quoted
Why not do something like the below?...Yep, sounds like a good approach, thanks. Percpu partial is not *the* SLUB fast path, so it should be sufficient without the lockless cmpxchg tricks. Will incorporate in updated series.The updated series incorporating hopefully all fixes from Mike and bigeasy, and rebased to 5.14-rc3 (Thomas told me RT is moving to it), is here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=slub-local-lock-v3r0
I had to resurrect the hunk below to build with lockdep, but modulo dinky speedbump, the same RT testdrive that previously exploded was as entertainment free as such testing is supposed to be. --- mm/slub.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c@@ -2890,7 +2890,11 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_c load_freelist: +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT + lockdep_assert_held(this_cpu_ptr(&s->cpu_slab->lock.lock)); +#else lockdep_assert_held(this_cpu_ptr(&s->cpu_slab->lock)); +#endif /* * freelist is pointing to the list of objects to be used.