On Fri, 5 Mar 2021, Daniel Wagner wrote:

On 05.03.21 16:29, John Kacur wrote:

quoted

How about --json ?
Description, "Optionally output final results to FILENAME in JSON format"

Ah, that reminds me why I opted for output initially. We had the discussion to
support different output formats. But if we just stick with JSON, --json is
way better.

What about finishing this series first and then I send the output -> json
cleanup?

Fair enough.

John