Re: [PATCH rt-tests v1 2/2] cyclicdeadline.c: Fix printf format specifier
From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-03-04 00:22:05
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Daniel Wagner wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The fields are not uint64 just longs, update the printf format specifiers. Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <redacted> --- src/sched_deadline/cyclicdeadline.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/src/sched_deadline/cyclicdeadline.c b/src/sched_deadline/cyclicdeadline.c index ed3c960d9916..bb8ffc3642bc 100644 --- a/src/sched_deadline/cyclicdeadline.c +++ b/src/sched_deadline/cyclicdeadline.c@@ -978,9 +978,9 @@ static void write_stats(FILE *f, void *data) for (i = 0; i < nr_threads; i++) { s = &sd[i].stat; fprintf(f, " \"%u\": {\n", i); - fprintf(f, " \"cycles\": %" PRIu64 ",\n", s->cycles); - fprintf(f, " \"min\": %" PRIu64 ",\n", s->min); - fprintf(f, " \"max\": %" PRIu64 ",\n", s->max); + fprintf(f, " \"cycles\": %ld,\n", s->cycles); + fprintf(f, " \"min\": %ld,\n", s->min); + fprintf(f, " \"max\": %ld\n", s->max); fprintf(f, " \"avg\": %.2f\n", s->avg/s->cycles); fprintf(f, " }%s\n", i == nr_threads - 1 ? "" : ","); }-- 2.30.0
Also Reported-by: Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: John Kacur [off-list ref]