On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 05:49:47PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:

Hi Peter,

On 19.02.21 17:39, Peter Xu wrote:

quoted

Now I tried to fix it but it seems you don't really like my fix.

Sorry I didn't want to say I don't like your fix. I just said, I would
appreciate if things would stay consistent. But then it seems there is
not much interest in this.

quoted

Would you propose yours instead?  I would be more than glad if your version is
better then I'm happy to drop mine.  Otherwise I'll still prefer to have this
patch merged to unbreak it first.

I don't care too much. If this patch fixes your problem don't let me
stop you.

It's not really my problem, I can compile my own binary.  It's just that I want
to have it working as usual for anyone using it.  Also it'll be great to have
it fixed sooner for our downstream so our QE won't be affect.  I don't want the
unbreak to be delayed by any further cleanup idea anymore - I am totally not
against that, but again I think they can be done on top of a working tree.

Sorry if my wording was too harsh - I apologize for that.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu