Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 2 authors, 2019-02-13

Re: [PATCH v14 06/15] tracing: Add hist trigger snapshot() action

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2019-02-13 19:25:57
Also in: lkml

On Tue,  5 Feb 2019 16:41:52 -0600
Tom Zanussi [off-list ref] wrote:
+static struct track_data *track_data_alloc(unsigned int key_len,
+					   struct action_data *action_data,
+					   struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data)
+{
+	struct track_data *data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
+	unsigned int size = TASK_COMM_LEN;
Why have the variable "size"?
+	struct hist_elt_data *elt_data;
+
+	if (!data)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	data->key = kzalloc(key_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!data->key) {
+		track_data_free(data);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
+
+	data->key_len = key_len;
+	data->action_data = action_data;
+	data->hist_data = hist_data;
+
+	elt_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*elt_data), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!elt_data) {
+		track_data_free(data);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
+	data->elt.private_data = elt_data;
+
+	elt_data->comm = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
Why not just do:

	elt_data->comm = kzalloc(TASK_COMM_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);

?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	if (!elt_data->comm) {
+		track_data_free(data);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
+
+	return data;
+}
+
 static char last_hist_cmd[MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL];
 static char hist_err_str[MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL];
 
@@ -1726,12 +1805,6 @@ static struct hist_field *find_event_var(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
 	return hist_field;
 }
 
-struct hist_elt_data {
-	char *comm;
-	u64 *var_ref_vals;
-	char *field_var_str[SYNTH_FIELDS_MAX];
-};
-
 static u64 hist_field_var_ref(struct hist_field *hist_field,
 			      struct tracing_map_elt *elt,
 			      struct ring_buffer_event *rbe,
@@ -3452,6 +3525,112 @@ static bool check_track_val(struct tracing_map_elt *elt,
 	return data->track_data.check_val(track_val, var_val);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_SNAPSHOT
+static bool cond_snapshot_update(struct trace_array *tr, void *cond_data)
+{
+	/* called with tr->max_lock held */
+	struct track_data *track_data = tr->cond_snapshot->cond_data;
+	struct hist_elt_data *elt_data, *track_elt_data;
+	struct snapshot_context *context = cond_data;
+	u64 track_val;
+
+	if (!track_data)
+		return false;
+
+	track_val = get_track_val(track_data->hist_data, context->elt,
+				  track_data->action_data);
+
+	track_data->track_val = track_val;
+	memcpy(track_data->key, context->key, track_data->key_len);
+
+	elt_data = context->elt->private_data;
+	track_elt_data = track_data->elt.private_data;
+	if (elt_data->comm)
+		memcpy(track_elt_data->comm, elt_data->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
I noticed this because we hardcode the size in memcpy. Should hard code
it above, otherwise it looks like elt_data->comm may be something other
than TASK_COMM_LEN.

-- Steve
+
+	track_data->updated = true;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help