Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2019-01-09

Re: [PATCH RT] x86/mm/pat: disable preemption __split_large_page() after spin_lock()

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2019-01-09 08:48:45
Also in: lkml

On 2019-01-08 18:39:15 [-0600], Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 17:44 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
quoted
Commit "x86/mm/pat: Disable preemption around __flush_tlb_all()" added a
warning if __flush_tlb_all() is invoked in preemptible context. On !RT
the warning does not trigger because a spin lock is acquired which
disables preemption. On RT the spin lock does not disable preemption and
so the warning is seen.

Disable preemption to avoid the warning in __flush_tlb_all().

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
FWIW, that __flush_tlb_all() can probably just be removed.  It was added as
a partial workaround for an erratum, but since it didn't completely solve
the problem, hugepages were disabled on the affected chips in commit
7a0fc404ae66377 ("x86: Disable large pages on CPUs with Atom erratum
AAE44").  I was going to send a (non-RT) patch removing the flush but in
4.20 commit c0a759abf5a68 ("x86/mm/cpa: Move flush_tlb_all()") reworked the
code to make it moot.
Let me make a note for next major version.
-Scott
Sebastian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help