Re: [RFD/RFC PATCH 0/8] Towards implementing proxy execution
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2018-10-09 10:51:27
Also in:
lkml
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2018-10-09 10:51:27
Also in:
lkml
On 2018-10-09 11:24:26 [+0200], Juri Lelli wrote:
The main concerns I have with the current approach is that, being based on mutex.c, it's both - not linked with futexes - not involving "legacy" priority inheritance (rt_mutex.c) I believe one of the main reasons Peter started this on mutexes is to have better coverage of potential problems (which I can assure everybody it had). I'm not yet sure what should we do moving forward, and this is exactly what I'd be pleased to hear your opinions on.
wasn't the idea that once it works to get rid of rt_mutex? Sebastian