Re: [PATCH RT 08/22] Revert "x86: UV: raw_spinlock conversion"
From: Mike Galbraith <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-06 08:38:55
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 09:35 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-09-05 08:28:02 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:quoted
4.14.63-rt41-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> [ Upstream commit 2a9c45d8f89112458364285cbe2b0729561953f1 ] Drop the Ultraviolet patch. UV looks broken upstream for PREEMPT, too. Mike is the only person I know that has such a thing and he isn't going to fix this upstream (from 1526977462.6491.1.camel@gmx.de):I don't think that we need to propagate that revert for stable. I reverted it in the devel tree because nobody wanted this upstream and I couldn't test it. For that reason I didn't see the point for having it in the RT tree. However, if you want to revert it for stable, be my guest. It probably will have no impact and if it will people might step forward and fix it properly / upstream.
I'm in favor of reverting it as useless cruft. UV has been broken forever wrt PREEMPT, and nobody cares. The original interest in UV RT support evaporated while 2.6.33-rt was still current (and when getting it working took a bit more than a spinlock conversion). -Mike