Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 2 authors, 2018-01-17
STALE3100d

[PATCH RT 01/13] rtmutex: Make lock_killable work

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2018-01-17 15:14:37
Also in: lkml, stable
Subsystem: locking primitives, the rest · Maintainers: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Will Deacon, Boqun Feng, Linus Torvalds

3.18.91-rt98-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>

Locking an rt mutex killable does not work because signal handling is
restricted to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE.

Use signal_pending_state() unconditionaly.

Cc: rt-stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 19 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 8d950b4521fc..da35f7ef5324 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1532,18 +1532,13 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
 		if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter))
 			break;
 
-		/*
-		 * TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE checks for signals and
-		 * timeout. Ignored otherwise.
-		 */
-		if (unlikely(state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)) {
-			/* Signal pending? */
-			if (signal_pending(current))
-				ret = -EINTR;
-			if (timeout && !timeout->task)
-				ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
-			if (ret)
-				break;
+		if (timeout && !timeout->task) {
+			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+			break;
+		}
+		if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
+			ret = -EINTR;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		if (ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
-- 
2.13.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help