Re: question about rcuc/X tasks
From: Chris Friesen <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-15 15:20:37
On 12/15/2016 08:07 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:47:37 +0100 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Chris, On 12/12/2016 11:42 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:quoted
Based on the fact that Documentation/kernel-per-CPU-kthreads.txt describes CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y as a solution by preventing the rcuc/%u kthreads from having any work to do, I had expected that the "rcu_nocbs=1-15" kernel parameter would have a similar effect.Paul, would rcu_nocbs=1-15 work? Or should ALL be used ? I'm assuming this is on a 16 CPUs box, in which case I don't see much of a difference for not just using ALL as it is almost there anyway ;-) -- Steve
Yes, this was a 16 CPU box. The blocker for CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL is that the set of management/housekeeping CPUs is configurable by the end-user, so while it defaults to only CPU0 as management it's not guaranteed that it will always be that way. On a related note, I found an old email from Paul suggesting that the various rcuc/X threads could be affined to the management CPUs to free up the "realtime" cores, but when I try that it doesn't let me change affinity. Was that disallowed for technical reasons? (It's also possible it's something local, in which case I need to go digging.) Thanks, Chris