On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 12:59:58 +0100
Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:

No, none of this stands a chance of being accepted.

This is making bad code worse.

Peter,

Instead of a flat out rejection, can you please provide some
constructive criticism to let those that are working on this know what
would be accepted? And what their next steps should be.

There's obviously a problem with the current code, what steps do you
recommend to fix it?

-- Steve