Re: [PATCH RT 3.18] irq_work: Provide a soft-irq based queue
From: Mike Galbraith <hidden>
Date: 2015-04-23 07:01:27
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:50 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2015-04-23 08:11, Mike Galbraith wrote:quoted
@@ -103,6 +98,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_queue_on); /* Enqueue the irq work @work on the current CPU */ bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work) { + bool realtime = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL); + bool raise = false; + /* Only queue if not already pending */ if (!irq_work_claim(work)) return false;@@ -110,25 +108,22 @@ bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *wor /* Queue the entry and raise the IPI if needed. */ preempt_disable(); -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL - if (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ) { + if (realtime && (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ)) { if (llist_add(&work->llnode,this_cpu_ptr(&hirq_work_list)))This boils down to #ifdef CONFIG_X some_type x; #endif ... if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X) && ...) use(x); And here we even have an indirection for IS_ENABLED via that local bool variable. Is that pattern OK for Linux? Does it compile in all supported optimization levels of all supported compilers?
I hope it all goes away, that being what IS_ENABLED() is there for.
-Mike