Re: [PATCH RT 0/3] Linux 3.10.47-rt50-rc1
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2014-07-16 15:22:33
Also in:
lkml
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2014-07-16 15:22:33
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:31:17 -0500 Corey Minyard [off-list ref] wrote:
I originally did a patch that just always did the else clause (the schedule_work_on() and wait_for_completion()) on all CPUs. That seemed to work just fine and simplifies the code a bit and gets rid of all the preempt/migrate calls. You could try that approach, or I could submit something if you liked.
Yeah, perhaps that's the way to go. But it needs to go to mainline before it goes to -rt. Can you resend it against my for-next branch. Thanks, -- Steve