Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2014-07-16

Re: [PATCH RT 0/3] Linux 3.10.47-rt50-rc1

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2014-07-16 15:22:33
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:31:17 -0500
Corey Minyard [off-list ref] wrote:

 
I originally did a patch that just always did the else clause (the
schedule_work_on() and wait_for_completion()) on all CPUs.  That seemed
to work just fine and simplifies the code a bit and gets rid of all the
preempt/migrate calls.  You could try that approach, or I could submit
something if you liked.
Yeah, perhaps that's the way to go. But it needs to go to mainline
before it goes to -rt.

Can you resend it against my for-next branch.

Thanks,

-- Steve
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help