Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2014-03-12

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2014-03-10 18:14:53
Also in: lkml

On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:52:42 +0000
Ben Hutchings [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted
On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 +0000
Ben Hutchings [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted
Here's the new patch:
Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it
doesn't compile.  WTF?
Hi Ben,

This is an old thread. Which kernel did you apply it to. Before I send
any patch set out, I run a small test (heavy stress test, and also
compile several different configs). This patch was against 3.10-rt, and
may have already had the includes needed. I know the original patch
compiled, but I may not have tested the second patch.

Do you need this patch? Or did I miss something for 3.2-rt?
You applied it to 3.2-rt:

commit 916c8d2de3c4759f57426fa3cfee63b491e88939
Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [off-list ref]
Date:   Mon Oct 28 11:50:06 2013 +0100

    swait: Add a few more users

and 3.4-rt, 3.8-rt, 3.10-rt.  So far as I can see, it is broken on all
of those branches, though I only actually tried building 3.2-rt.
Can you send me your config. I may just not be hitting it. I've booted
and ran all these kernels I've posted.

I don't run a make allmodconfig as I do on my upstream work. Maybe I'll
have to add that to the mix.

-- Steve
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help