Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2014-03-10 18:14:53
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:52:42 +0000 Ben Hutchings [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:quoted
On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 +0000 Ben Hutchings [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:quoted
Here's the new patch:Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it doesn't compile. WTF?Hi Ben, This is an old thread. Which kernel did you apply it to. Before I send any patch set out, I run a small test (heavy stress test, and also compile several different configs). This patch was against 3.10-rt, and may have already had the includes needed. I know the original patch compiled, but I may not have tested the second patch. Do you need this patch? Or did I miss something for 3.2-rt?You applied it to 3.2-rt: commit 916c8d2de3c4759f57426fa3cfee63b491e88939 Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [off-list ref] Date: Mon Oct 28 11:50:06 2013 +0100 swait: Add a few more users and 3.4-rt, 3.8-rt, 3.10-rt. So far as I can see, it is broken on all of those branches, though I only actually tried building 3.2-rt.
Can you send me your config. I may just not be hitting it. I've booted and ran all these kernels I've posted. I don't run a make allmodconfig as I do on my upstream work. Maybe I'll have to add that to the mix. -- Steve