[PATCH] API cleanup - use local_lock not __local_lock for soft
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-17 19:44:06
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
trivial API cleanup - kernel/softirq.c was mimiking local_lock. No change of functional behavior Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <redacted> --- kernel/softirq.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 2da729b..15ad603 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c@@ -505,12 +505,12 @@ void __init softirq_early_init(void) static void lock_softirq(int which) { - __local_lock(&__get_cpu_var(local_softirq_locks[which])); + local_lock(local_softirq_locks[which]); } static void unlock_softirq(int which) { - __local_unlock(&__get_cpu_var(local_softirq_locks[which])); + local_unlock(local_softirq_locks[which]); } static void do_single_softirq(int which, int need_rcu_bh_qs)
--
1.7.2.5