On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:47:18 -0400
Paul Gortmaker [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:34:13 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Dear RT folks!

I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.

Does this mean that I can drop 3.6-rt in favor of 3.8-rt?

I'd guess that the trade-off would be 3.0-rt against 3.8-rt.
The above comment assumes 3.0 is aged out vs. 3.6 kernel.

Not at all. I've always said that I would support -rt as long as the
base was supported by the official stable. 3.6 is not supported, and I
only supported it because it was the "latest" stable -rt. When 3.8-rt
comes out, it would also be the latest. But it too is not supported by
the official stable release. I'll only be doing that one until 3.10
becomes stable again. Luckily, 3.8 is being supported by Kamal, and
I'll probably just base my work off of his.

3.0-rt wont last long, as IIRC, Greg will be letting that go off to
ashes in a few months.

quoted

I'm just about finished with a 3.6 stable, which I'll finish, add -rt
to it, and then call it "unsupported" after that. Well, I may take bug
fixes if people find any in the near future.

I'm behind on 3.4-rt, 3.2-rt and of course 3.0-rt. Hopefully, I'll get
them all out this week.

I expect that the 3.10-rt kernel will replace the older RT kernels.

No, it will just enter the realm of the official stable releases.

-- Steve