Re: [PATCH v2] list_bl.h: make list head locking RT safe

[PATCH 0/2] Avoid more bit_spin_lock usage on RT kernels · Paul Gortmaker <hidden> · 2013-06-10
[PATCH 1/2] list_bl.h: make list head locking RT safe · Paul Gortmaker <hidden> · 2013-06-10
Re: [PATCH 1/2] list_bl.h: make list head locking RT safe · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2013-06-21
Re: [PATCH 1/2] list_bl.h: make list head locking RT safe · Paul Gortmaker <hidden> · 2013-06-21
Re: [PATCH 1/2] list_bl.h: make list head locking RT safe · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2013-06-21
[PATCH v2] list_bl.h: make list head locking RT safe · Paul Gortmaker <hidden> · 2013-06-21
Re: [PATCH v2] list_bl.h: make list head locking RT safe · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2013-06-28
[PATCH 2/2] list_bl: make list head lock a raw lock · Paul Gortmaker <hidden> · 2013-06-10
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Avoid more bit_spin_lock usage on RT kernels · Paul E. McKenney <hidden> · 2013-06-10

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2013-06-28 11:23:57

On 06/21/2013 09:07 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

As per changes in include/linux/jbd_common.h for avoiding the
bit_spin_locks on RT ("fs: jbd/jbd2: Make state lock and journal
head lock rt safe") we do the same thing here.

applied.

Sebastian

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help