Re: [PATCH -rt] MIPS: Octeon: convert smp_reserve_lock to raw spinlock
From: Ralf Baechle <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-17 20:50:16
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:30:42AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:30:42 -0700 From: David Daney <redacted> To: Yong Zhang <redacted>, ralf@linux-mips.org CC: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david.daney@cavium.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] MIPS: Octeon: convert smp_reserve_lock to raw spinlock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 05/17/2012 03:15 AM, Yong Zhang wrote:quoted
From: Yong Zhang<redacted> Because __cpu_disable is called in atomic context and spinlock is a mutex on -rt. Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<redacted> --- arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c index ef9c34a..473c72b 100644 --- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c +++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_state); extern void fixup_irqs(void); -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(smp_reserve_lock); +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(smp_reserve_lock);Ralf added this in 773cb77d (MIPS: Cavium: Add CPU hotplugging code.) I'm not even sure what this lock is supposed to be protecting, so I would like Ralf to take a look. You can add an Acked-by: from me for either this patch as is, or if Ralf thinks it is OK, removing the lock entirely. In any event we can merge this via Ralf's tree.
The 773cb77d patch has a long history but I think I first worked on it for Wind River Linux 2.0 which was 2.6.21-based, then broke it out and pushed it upstream. In 2.6.21 it was probably infected by the the smp_reserve_lock virus in the s390 code for no good reason. So I agree, the lock can be dropped and I'm queueing a patch to do so for 3.5. Ralf