Re: [PATCH] RFC - rt-tools: Detect whether numa is available at build time
From: Frank Rowand <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-29 00:50:04
From: Frank Rowand <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-29 00:50:04
On 05/25/12 16:39, John Kacur wrote:
This is a preliminary hack, I need to clean it up a little, but incase you want to give it a try, here is the alpha version. Note - I stole this methodology from tools/perf Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
I knew I would regret suggesting this fix. It works fine on my fedora 12 x86_64 system for native build. It works fine on my fedora 12 x86_64 system for crossbuild for ARM. The NUMA=0 option is still useful (thank you for leaving that in place). I have a second ARM target board, where the cross linker does not complain about libnuma, so cyclictest is build with libnuma. But my run time environment does not have a libnuma. Ah the joy of pre-release file systems. The NUMA=0 option allowed me to properly build cyclictest to run on this not quite yet finished file system. Tested-by: Frank Rowand <redacted> -Frank