Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 3 authors, 2012-03-06
STALE5256d

[PATCH RT 21/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] ring-buffer/rt: Check for irqs disabled before grabbing reader lock

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2012-03-06 16:58:31
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: the rest, tracing · Maintainers: Linus Torvalds, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

In RT the reader lock is a mutex and we can not grab it when preemption is
disabled. The in_atomic() check that is there does not check if irqs are
disabled. Add that check as well.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Carsten Emde <redacted>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Clark Williams <redacted>
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120301190345.786365803@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 2467714..2ffbb9d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ static inline int ok_to_lock(void)
 	if (in_nmi())
 		return 0;
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
-	if (in_atomic())
+	if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled())
 		return 0;
 #endif
 	return 1;
-- 
1.7.8.3

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help