Re: [PATCH RT 2/2 v4] preempt-rt/x86: Delay calling signals in int3
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2012-02-06 16:38:14
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 17:25 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 02/06, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted
quoted
This is certainly wrong in upstream kernel. It does use force_ this way although it shouldn't imho.It's wrong in upstream even with the #ifdef define here?No, the patch has no effect if !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL.
Well then, it is perfectly correct for the upstream kernel with the #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL added ;-) -- Steve