On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Mike Galbraith [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 09:42 +0100, Rolando Martins wrote:

quoted

Hi Peter,
is there any progress on the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED front?

Out of curiosity, why would you want that in a -rt kernel?

I am building a rt middleware that uses cgroups to reserve cpu
bandwidth for a set of tasks.
But I also interested in minimization latencies...

(I haven't done any PI testing with that, but I can imagine the throttle
causing heartburn)

       -Mike

quoted

I don't know if this is related, but in 33-rt if I used a low (=100)
cpu_runtime_us and cpu_period_us then I would get some freezes
(something that does not happen in 2.6.39).

(providing a realtime budget of 100 whole microseconds to a kernel where
everything and it's brother is realtime is unlikely to go well)

I empirically tested values until I reached this one. Anything above
this would result in a huge amount of jitter
(to all tasks under a control group), at least on my boxes (corei7
920, and AMD phenom x4 950).

Rolando

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html