Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 8 authors, 2007-10-05

Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386

From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-01 21:43:46
Also in: lkml

IRQ_NOBALANCING is not preventing cpu unplug. It moves the affinity to the
next CPU, but the check in NMI watchdog for CPU == 0 would not longer
work.
That cannot happen right now because cpu_disable() on both i386/x86-64
reject CPU #0. So just setting IRQ_NOBALANCING is sufficient and both
do that already. I was wrong earlier in being concerned about this.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 int tick_do_broadcast(cpumask_t mask)
@@ -137,6 +147,7 @@ int tick_do_broadcast(cpumask_t mask)
 		cpu_clear(cpu, mask);
 		td = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_device, cpu);
 		td->evtdev->event_handler(td->evtdev);
+		tick_broadcast_account(cpu);
That would not handle the case with a single CPU running only
irq  0 but not broadcasting I think.

I believe ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/fix-watchdog
is the correct fix

-Andi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help