Thread (58 messages) 58 messages, 8 authors, 2007-10-05

Re: [PATCH RFC 3/9] RCU: Preemptible RCU

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2007-09-21 15:21:04
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:34:12AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
+
+/*
+ * PREEMPT_RCU data structures.
+ */
+
+#define GP_STAGES 4
+struct rcu_data {
+	spinlock_t	lock;		/* Protect rcu_data fields. */
+	long		completed;	/* Number of last completed batch. */
+	int		waitlistcount;
+	struct tasklet_struct rcu_tasklet;
+	struct rcu_head *nextlist;
+	struct rcu_head **nexttail;
+	struct rcu_head *waitlist[GP_STAGES];
+	struct rcu_head **waittail[GP_STAGES];
+	struct rcu_head *donelist;
+	struct rcu_head **donetail;
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE
+	struct rcupreempt_trace trace;
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
+};
+struct rcu_ctrlblk {
+	spinlock_t	fliplock;	/* Protect state-machine transitions. */
+	long		completed;	/* Number of last completed batch. */
+};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data);
+static struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_ctrlblk = {
+	.fliplock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
+	.completed = 0,
+};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int [2], rcu_flipctr) = { 0, 0 };
+
+/*
+ * States for rcu_try_flip() and friends.
+ */
+
+enum rcu_try_flip_states {
+	rcu_try_flip_idle_state,	/* "I" */
+	rcu_try_flip_waitack_state, 	/* "A" */
+	rcu_try_flip_waitzero_state,	/* "Z" */
+	rcu_try_flip_waitmb_state	/* "M" */
+};
+static enum rcu_try_flip_states rcu_try_flip_state = rcu_try_flip_idle_state;
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE
+static char *rcu_try_flip_state_names[] =
+	{ "idle", "waitack", "waitzero", "waitmb" };
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
[snip]
+/*
+ * If a global counter flip has occurred since the last time that we
+ * advanced callbacks, advance them.  Hardware interrupts must be
+ * disabled when calling this function.
+ */
+static void __rcu_advance_callbacks(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+	int cpu;
+	int i;
+	int wlc = 0;
+
+	if (rdp->completed != rcu_ctrlblk.completed) {
+		if (rdp->waitlist[GP_STAGES - 1] != NULL) {
+			*rdp->donetail = rdp->waitlist[GP_STAGES - 1];
+			rdp->donetail = rdp->waittail[GP_STAGES - 1];
+			RCU_TRACE_RDP(rcupreempt_trace_move2done, rdp);
+		}
+		for (i = GP_STAGES - 2; i >= 0; i--) {
+			if (rdp->waitlist[i] != NULL) {
+				rdp->waitlist[i + 1] = rdp->waitlist[i];
+				rdp->waittail[i + 1] = rdp->waittail[i];
+				wlc++;
+			} else {
+				rdp->waitlist[i + 1] = NULL;
+				rdp->waittail[i + 1] =
+					&rdp->waitlist[i + 1];
+			}
+		}
+		if (rdp->nextlist != NULL) {
+			rdp->waitlist[0] = rdp->nextlist;
+			rdp->waittail[0] = rdp->nexttail;
+			wlc++;
+			rdp->nextlist = NULL;
+			rdp->nexttail = &rdp->nextlist;
+			RCU_TRACE_RDP(rcupreempt_trace_move2wait, rdp);
+		} else {
+			rdp->waitlist[0] = NULL;
+			rdp->waittail[0] = &rdp->waitlist[0];
+		}
+		rdp->waitlistcount = wlc;
+		rdp->completed = rcu_ctrlblk.completed;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check to see if this CPU needs to report that it has seen
+	 * the most recent counter flip, thereby declaring that all
+	 * subsequent rcu_read_lock() invocations will respect this flip.
+	 */
+
+	cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+	if (per_cpu(rcu_flip_flag, cpu) == rcu_flipped) {
+		smp_mb();  /* Subsequent counter accesses must see new value */
+		per_cpu(rcu_flip_flag, cpu) = rcu_flip_seen;
+		smp_mb();  /* Subsequent RCU read-side critical sections */
+			   /*  seen -after- acknowledgement. */
+	}
+}
[snip]
+/*
+ * Attempt a single flip of the counters.  Remember, a single flip does
+ * -not- constitute a grace period.  Instead, the interval between
+ * at least three consecutive flips is a grace period.
+ *
+ * If anyone is nuts enough to run this CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU implementation
+ * on a large SMP, they might want to use a hierarchical organization of
+ * the per-CPU-counter pairs.
+ */
+static void rcu_try_flip(void)
+{
+	unsigned long oldirq;
+
+	RCU_TRACE_ME(rcupreempt_trace_try_flip_1);
+	if (unlikely(!spin_trylock_irqsave(&rcu_ctrlblk.fliplock, oldirq))) {
+		RCU_TRACE_ME(rcupreempt_trace_try_flip_e1);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Take the next transition(s) through the RCU grace-period
+	 * flip-counter state machine.
+	 */
+
+	switch (rcu_try_flip_state) {
+	case rcu_try_flip_idle_state:
+		if (rcu_try_flip_idle())
+			rcu_try_flip_state = rcu_try_flip_waitack_state;
+		break;
+	case rcu_try_flip_waitack_state:
+		if (rcu_try_flip_waitack())
+			rcu_try_flip_state = rcu_try_flip_waitzero_state;
+		break;
+	case rcu_try_flip_waitzero_state:
+		if (rcu_try_flip_waitzero())
+			rcu_try_flip_state = rcu_try_flip_waitmb_state;
+		break;
+	case rcu_try_flip_waitmb_state:
+		if (rcu_try_flip_waitmb())
+			rcu_try_flip_state = rcu_try_flip_idle_state;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rcu_ctrlblk.fliplock, oldirq);
+}
Paul,

Looking further into this, I still think this is a bit of overkill. We
go through 20 states from call_rcu to list->func().

On call_rcu we put our stuff on the next list. Before we move stuff from
next to wait, we need to go through 4 states. So we have

next -> 4 states -> wait[0] -> 4 states -> wait[1] -> 4 states ->
wait[2] -> 4 states -> wait[3] -> 4 states -> done.

That's 20 states that we go through from the time we add our function to
the list to the time it actually gets called. Do we really need the 4
wait lists?

Seems a bit overkill to me.

What am I missing?

-- Steve
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help