Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 6 authors, 2007-07-18

Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19

From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-08 22:50:36
Also in: lkml

On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 15:36 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 11:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Changes since 2.6.21.5-rt18:

- Fixed a nasty and hard to track down slowness / boot problem on SMP
machines with CONFIG_NOHZ enabled. The problem was caused by the timer
wheel base lock held during the get_next_timer_interrupt() call in the
idle path, which eventually led to a bogus PI boosting of the idle task
and in consequence a stale wrong scheduler selection for the affected idle
task.

Kudos to Carsten Emde, who patiently and meticulously isolated the
problem and provided the traces, which allowed to identify the root cause.

Problem solution: Prevent idle task boosting
quoted
quoted
Maybe someone remember me whining about troubles with 2.6.21-rt2..18 
on my Core2 T7200 laptop (fujitsu-siemens amilo i1520).

Althought I'm still with my fingers crossed, I can tell the good 
news are that 2.6.21.5-rt19 (and -rt20) does behave far better now 
on the very same box.
Yes, it works much better indeed...

Ingo: is there a place where I can read about the changes in different 
rtxx releases? What is new/better/fixed in rt20? (I see scheduler 
stuff in a diff from rt19 to rt20 but I don't really know what it 
means).
and rt18 was a -rt-only NOHZ fix, that bug got introduced in rt11 when 
CFS was merged.

i _think_ Rui might have seen two separate problems. Perhaps by the time 
we fixed the first problem (which Rui saw since -rt2) we introduced the 
other one via -rt11 - which then got fixed in -rt19.
Ahh, CFS is now part of rt, I was obviously not paying attention... I'm
really trying to provide a "stable" rt kernel for audio usage and
including another subsystem into rt is - IMHO - not going to help.
What's the chance of splitting things?
quoted
btw., we'd love to get more feedback regarding CFS. CFS is a completely 
new scheduler for Linux. 
Then I'd rather have it separate from rt. 
Please?

I would like to provide the least ammount of new functionality that is
really necessary in my audio kernels. Audio related requirements include
the rt patch but not a new scheduler. 
quoted
It has a design centered around keeping 
application latencies down, so it is ultimately real-time friendly, and 
it should also make things work better for desktop-ish and audio-ish 
stuff as well. (even under SCHED_OTHER)
Maybe this is CFS related? (tail of a thread in the Planet CCRMA mailing
list):

On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 15:26 -0400, Hector Centeno wrote:
quoted
Ok, so just to confirm, that 2.6.21-0182.rt19.1.fc7.ccrmart works fine
on my desktop but on my laptop it makes Firefox and Tomboy to crash.
On the same laptop using 2.6.21-0182.rt17.1.fc7.ccrmart there is no
problem.
It looks to my untrained eye like it is CFS related, I'm attaching the
last part of the strace of firefox while it tries to load a flash site.
The firefox process is left in an unkillable (not even by -9) state.
What else could I provide to debug the problem? (this is in a T61 laptop
with the Intel 7700 processor). 

-- Fernando
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help