* Chris Wright [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

thanks! I ran into this before and asked for the fastcalls to not be 
removed from upstream paravirt.c but to no avail it seems. It does 
no harm to anyone to keep the 'fastcall' declarations and 
definitions for places where _actual assembly code_ depends on the 
calling convention. Could someone please send this upstream-wards 
too?

Yes, I agree, it's actually documenting the subtlety of the calling 
convention, not just noise in the source.  The upstream patch is 
different, I'll sort one out.

great!

	Ingo