Am Mittwoch, 1. August 2018, 14:43:47 CEST schrieb Souptick Joarder:

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Heiko Stuebner [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi Souptick,

Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2018, 22:34:30 CEST schrieb Souptick Joarder:

quoted

convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume() to use
drm_mode_config_helper_suspend/resume().

With this conversion, rockchip_drm_fb_resume() and
rockchip_drm_fb_suspend() will not be used anymore.
Both of these functions can be removed.

Also, in struct rockchip_drm_private state will not be
used anymore. So this can be removed forever.

Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ajit Negi <redacted>

the patch itself looks great, just a simple bookkeeping question.

What role did Ajit play in creating the patch? If I remember correctly
it is meant to be
- 1st Signed-off: Patch-Author
- 2nd Signed-off: E-Mail sender + patch possibly patch changes
(optional of course if the same)

So was this meant to be a Reviewed-by from Ajit?

We both are working together for these patches to
convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume().
That's the reason to add his name in 2nd Signed-off
in all similar patches.

Is it a incorrect way to put 2nd Signed-off here ?

Thanks for the clarification and the interesting question :-)

I've just read through Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
and it seems there is an "official" way to show that relationship, via a
tag named "Co-Developed-by:" described under number 12.

So I guess we could just adapt the patch accordingly, if that is ok with
both of you (i.e. I can change this when applying, so no need to resend).


Heiko


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel