Thread (48 messages) 48 messages, 4 authors, 2024-03-25

Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] mm/memory: optimize fork() with PTE-mapped THP

From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2024-01-31 13:00:01
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-s390, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux

quoted
I'm also surprised about the dontneed vs. munmap numbers.
You mean the ones for Altra that I posted? (I didn't post any for M2). The altra
numbers look ok to me; dontneed has no change, and munmap has no change for
order-0 and is massively improved for order-9.

I would expect that dontneed would similarly benefit -- same code path. 
But I focused on munmap measurements for now, I'll try finding time to 
confirm that it's the same on Intel.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help