On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:26 AM Lorenz Bauer [off-list ref] wrote:
Fix some inconsistencies of bpf_jit_limit on non-x86 platforms.
I've dropped exposing bpf_jit_current since we couldn't agree on
file modes, correct names, etc.
Applied to bpf tree. Seems more appropriate there.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv