On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:55 AM Palmer Dabbelt [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:34:02 PDT (-0700), geert@linux-m68k.org wrote:

quoted

Hi Bin,

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:14 PM Bin Meng [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:23 PM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 3:44 AM Bin Meng [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi

@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ / {
        model = "Microchip MPFS Icicle Kit";
        compatible = "microchip,mpfs-icicle-kit";

+       aliases {
+               ethernet0 = &emac1;
+       };
+
        chosen {
        };

This should be added to the board DTS (microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts)
instead.

I was wondering the same thing before doing this, but when I checked
all other DTS in arch/riscv/boot I found the aliases node is put in
the SoC dtsi file instead of the board on so I think that's the
convention.

The numbering of the aliases is supposed to match the labels on the
board, hence it is board-specific, not SoC-specific.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

I don't see a v2 of this.

Will send v2 soon.

Regards,
Bin

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv