Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] riscv: Add support for restartable sequence
From: Vincent Chen <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-21 03:19:42
Also in:
linux-kselftest, lkml
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:43 PM Mathieu Desnoyers [off-list ref] wrote:
----- On Mar 9, 2020, at 1:59 AM, Vincent Chen vincent.chen@sifive.com wrote: [...]quoted
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, structpt_regs *regs) sigset_t *oldset = sigmask_to_save(); int ret; + rseq_signal_deliver(ksig, regs); /* Are we from a system call? */ if (regs->cause == EXC_SYSCALL) {[...] As Al Viro pointed out on IRC, the rseq_signal_deliver() should go after syscall restart handling, similarly to what is done on every other supported architecture.
Thanks for the notification. I will adjust the porting and try to send the patch again for review.
Note that there is already an upstream commit derived on this non-upstream patch:
commit 9866d141a097 ("csky: Add support for restartable sequence")
which is broken in the same way.
I'm not sure why I was never CC'd on the csky patch. Considering that nobody
bothered to implement the rseq selftests for csky, I don't see how any of
this is tested. I would favor a revert of that commit until the testing glue
is contributed. Unfortunately, the csky commit has been upstream since v5.7.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com_______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv