Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] RISC-V: Add crash kernel support
From: Nick Kossifidis <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-15 18:29:49
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hello Geert, Στις 2021-06-15 16:19, Geert Uytterhoeven έγραψε:
This does not match https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/master/schemas/chosen.yaml#L77: $ref: types.yaml#/definitions/uint64-array maxItems: 2 description: This property (currently used only on arm64) holds the memory range, the address and the size, of the elf core header which mainly describes the panicked kernel\'s memory layout as PT_LOAD segments of elf format. Hence "linux,elfcorehdr" should be a property of the /chosen node, instead of a memory node with a compatible value of "linux,elfcorehdr".
That's a binding for a property on the /chosen node, that as the text says it's defined for arm64 only and the code that handled it was also on arm64. Instead the reserved-region binding I used is a standard binding, if you don't like the name used for the compatible string because it overlaps with that property we can change it. I want to use a reserved-region for this because we'll have to reserve it anyway so using a property on /chosen and then using that property to reserve the region seemed suboptimal.
quoted
v2: * Use linux,usable-memory on /memory instead of a new bindingThis part seems to have been removed in v3 and later? Note that "linux,usable-memory-range" should be a property of the /chosen node, too, cfr. https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/master/schemas/chosen.yaml#L85
No special handling is needed when using linux,usable-memory on /memory, limiting the available memory is handled by generic code at drivers/of/fdt.c Regards, Nick _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv