Re: [PATCH rdma-rc] IB/core: fix a UAF for netdev in netdevice_event process
From: Ziyang Xuan (William) <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-25 08:37:46
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:42:58AM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:quoted
When a vlan netdev enter netdevice_event process although it is not a roce netdev, it will be passed to netdevice_event_work_handler() to process. In order to hold the netdev of netdevice_event after netdevice_event() return, call dev_hold() to hold the netdev in netdevice_queue_work(). But that did not consider the real_dev of a vlan netdev, the real_dev can be freed within netdevice_event_work_handler() be scheduled. It would trigger the UAF problem for the real_dev like following: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in vlan_dev_real_dev+0xf9/0x120 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88801648a0c4 by task kworker/u8:0/8 Workqueue: gid-cache-wq netdevice_event_work_handler Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 print_address_description.constprop.0.cold+0x93/0x334 kasan_report.cold+0x83/0xdf vlan_dev_real_dev+0xf9/0x120 is_eth_port_of_netdev_filter.part.0+0xb1/0x2c0 is_eth_port_of_netdev_filter+0x28/0x40 ib_enum_roce_netdev+0x1a3/0x300 ib_enum_all_roce_netdevs+0xc7/0x140 netdevice_event_work_handler+0x9d/0x210 ... Allocated by task 9289: kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 __kasan_kmalloc+0x9b/0xd0 __kmalloc_node+0x20a/0x330 kvmalloc_node+0x61/0xf0 alloc_netdev_mqs+0x9d/0x1140 rtnl_create_link+0x955/0xb70 __rtnl_newlink+0xe10/0x15b0 rtnl_newlink+0x64/0xa0 ... Freed by task 9288: kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30 kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 __kasan_slab_free+0xfc/0x130 slab_free_freelist_hook+0xdd/0x240 kfree+0xe4/0x690 kvfree+0x42/0x50 device_release+0x9f/0x240 kobject_put+0x1c8/0x530 put_device+0x1b/0x30 free_netdev+0x370/0x540 ppp_destroy_interface+0x313/0x3d0 ppp_release+0x1bf/0x240 ... Hold the real_dev for a vlan netdev in netdevice_event_work_handler() to fix the UAF problem. Fixes: 238fdf48f2b5 ("IB/core: Add RoCE table bonding support") Reported-by: syzbot+e4df4e1389e28972e955@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <redacted> --- drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c index 68197e576433..063dbe72b7c2 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c@@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ static void netdevice_event_work_handler(struct work_struct *_work) { struct netdev_event_work *work = container_of(_work, struct netdev_event_work, work); + struct net_device *real_dev; unsigned int i; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(work->cmds) && work->cmds[i].cb; i++) {@@ -628,6 +629,12 @@ static void netdevice_event_work_handler(struct work_struct *_work) work->cmds[i].filter_ndev, work->cmds[i].cb, work->cmds[i].ndev); + real_dev = rdma_vlan_dev_real_dev(work->cmds[i].ndev); + if (real_dev) + dev_put(real_dev); + real_dev = rdma_vlan_dev_real_dev(work->cmds[i].filter_ndev); + if (real_dev) + dev_put(real_dev); dev_put(work->cmds[i].ndev); dev_put(work->cmds[i].filter_ndev); }@@ -638,9 +645,10 @@ static void netdevice_event_work_handler(struct work_struct *_work) static int netdevice_queue_work(struct netdev_event_work_cmd *cmds, struct net_device *ndev) { - unsigned int i; struct netdev_event_work *ndev_work = kmalloc(sizeof(*ndev_work), GFP_KERNEL); + struct net_device *real_dev; + unsigned int i; if (!ndev_work) return NOTIFY_DONE;@@ -653,6 +661,12 @@ static int netdevice_queue_work(struct netdev_event_work_cmd *cmds, ndev_work->cmds[i].filter_ndev = ndev; dev_hold(ndev_work->cmds[i].ndev); dev_hold(ndev_work->cmds[i].filter_ndev); + real_dev = rdma_vlan_dev_real_dev(ndev_work->cmds[i].ndev); + if (real_dev) + dev_hold(real_dev); + real_dev = rdma_vlan_dev_real_dev(ndev_work->cmds[i].filter_ndev); + if (real_dev) + dev_hold(real_dev); } INIT_WORK(&ndev_work->work, netdevice_event_work_handler);Probably, this is the right change, but I don't know well enough that part of code. What prevents from "real_dev" to disappear right after your call to rdma_vlan_dev_real_dev()?
It is known that free the net_device until its dev_refcnt is one. The detail realization see netdev_run_todo().The real_dev's dev_refcnt of a vlan net_device will reach one after unregister_netdevice(&real_dev) and unregister_vlan_dev(&vlan_ndev, ...) but the dev_refcnt of the vlan net_device is bigger than one because netdevice_queue_work() will hold the vlan net_device. So my solution is hold the real_dev too in netdevice_queue_work().
Thanksquoted
-- 2.25.1.