Re: [PATCH -next] RDMA/hns: Fix return in hns_roce_rereg_user_mr()
From: YueHaibing <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-05 02:36:10
Also in:
lkml
On 2021/8/4 21:53, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 08:59:39PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:quoted
If re-registering an MR in hns_roce_rereg_user_mr(), we should return NULL instead of pass 0 to ERR_PTR. Fixes: 4e9fc1dae2a9 ("RDMA/hns: Optimize the MR registration process") Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <redacted> --- drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c index 006c84bb3f9f..7089ac780291 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c@@ -352,7 +352,9 @@ struct ib_mr *hns_roce_rereg_user_mr(struct ib_mr *ibmr, int flags, u64 start, free_cmd_mbox: hns_roce_free_cmd_mailbox(hr_dev, mailbox); - return ERR_PTR(ret); + if (ret) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + return NULL; }I don't understand this function, it returns or ERR_PTR() or NULL, but should return &mr->ibmr in success path. How does it work?
Did you means hns_roce_reg_user_mr()?
hns_roce_rereg_user_mr() returns ERR_PTR() on failure, and return NULL on success,
In ib_uverbs_rereg_mr(), old mr will be used if rereg_user_mr() return NULL, see:
829 new_mr = ib_dev->ops.rereg_user_mr(mr, cmd.flags, cmd.start, cmd.length,
830 cmd.hca_va, cmd.access_flags, new_pd,
831 &attrs->driver_udata);
832 if (IS_ERR(new_mr)) {
833 ret = PTR_ERR(new_mr);
834 goto put_new_uobj;
835 }
836 if (new_mr) {
.....
860 mr = new_mr;
861 } else {
862 if (cmd.flags & IB_MR_REREG_PD) {
863 atomic_dec(&orig_pd->usecnt);
864 mr->pd = new_pd;
865 atomic_inc(&new_pd->usecnt);
866 }
867 if (cmd.flags & IB_MR_REREG_TRANS)
868 mr->iova = cmd.hca_va;
869 }
Thanksquoted
int hns_roce_dereg_mr(struct ib_mr *ibmr, struct ib_udata *udata) -- 2.17.1.