Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2021-07-26

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] svcrdma: Fewer calls to wake_up() in Send completion handler

From: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Date: 2021-07-26 17:00:22
Also in: linux-nfs

On 7/26/2021 10:46 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  /**
   * svc_rdma_wc_send - Invoked by RDMA provider for each polled Send WC
   * @cq: Completion Queue context
@@ -275,11 +289,9 @@ static void svc_rdma_wc_send(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
  
  	trace_svcrdma_wc_send(wc, &ctxt->sc_cid);
  
+	svc_rdma_wake_send_waiters(rdma, 1);
  	complete(&ctxt->sc_done);
  
-	atomic_inc(&rdma->sc_sq_avail);
-	wake_up(&rdma->sc_send_wait);
This appears to change the order of wake_up() vs complete().
Is that intentional? Is there any possibility of a false
scheduler activation, later leading to a second wakeup or poll?

Tom.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help