Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/4] page_pool: Allow drivers to hint on SKB recycling
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2021-05-12 14:10:13
Also in:
bpf, linux-mm, lkml, netdev
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:50 AM Ilias Apalodimas [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]quoted
quoted
Since we added an extra argument on __skb_frag_unref() to handle recycling, update the current users of the function with that.This part could be done with a preliminary patch, only adding this extra boolean, this would keep the 'complex' patch smaller.Sure [...]quoted
quoted
#include <linux/uaccess.h> #include <trace/events/skb.h>@@ -645,6 +648,11 @@ static void skb_free_head(struct sk_buff *skb) { unsigned char *head = skb->head; +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_PAGE_POOL)Why IS_BUILTIN() ?No reason, we'll replace it with an ifdefquoted
PAGE_POOL is either y or n IS_ENABLED() would look better, since we use IS_BUILTIN() for the cases where a module might be used. Or simply #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOLquoted
+ if (skb->pp_recycle && page_pool_return_skb_page(head))This probably should be attempted only in the (skb->head_frag) case ?I think the extra check makes sense.
What do you mean here ?
quoted
Also this patch misses pskb_expand_head()I am not sure I am following. Misses what? pskb_expand_head() will either call skb_release_data() or skb_free_head(), which would either recycle or unmap the buffer for us (depending on the page refcnt)
pskb_expand_head() allocates a new skb->head, from slab. We should clear skb->pp_recycle for consistency of the skb->head_frag clearing we perform there. But then, I now realize you use skb->pp_recycle bit for both skb->head and fragments, and rely on this PP_SIGNATURE thing (I note that patch 1 changelog does not describe why a random page will _not_ have this signature by bad luck) Please document/describe which struct page fields are aliased with page->signature ? Thanks !