Re: [pull request][for-next 00/11] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch updates 2017-12-19

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:33:29PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:

Hi Dave and Doug,

==============
This series includes updates for mlx5 E-Switch infrastructures,
to be merged into net-next and rdma-next trees.

Mark's patches provide E-Switch refactoring that generalize the mlx5
E-Switch vf representors interfaces and data structures. The serious is
mainly focused on moving ethernet (netdev) specific representors logic out
of E-Switch (eswitch.c) into mlx5e representor module (en_rep.c), which
provides better separation and allows future support for other types of vf
representors (e.g. RDMA).

Gal's patches at the end of this serious, provide a simple syntax fix and
two other patches that handles vport ingress/egress ACL steering name
spaces to be aligned with the Firmware/Hardware specs.

Patch 10 actually looks quite worrysome if a card would support only
one ingress or egress, but if all of them support both, then it should
be fine yes. Is that possible, to support only one direction?

  Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html