Re: [rdma-next v1 13/22] RDMA/hns: Remove empty functions
From: Selvin Xavier <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-21 04:39:10
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Leon Romanovsky [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The following patch helps. But it is like a workaround to solve the problem.diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c index d5ca101..59911dd 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c@@ -4189,7 +4189,7 @@ static void cm_add_one(struct ib_device *ib_device) goto error2; ret = ib_modify_port(ib_device, i, 0, &port_modify); - if (ret) + if (ret && ret != -ENOSYS) goto error3; count++;Or should we have the modify_port hook with some basic checks?I think that your proposal is right thing to do. The driver should properly return the status of its callbacks (-ENOSYS) and it is responsibility of the caller to decide what to do in such case.
The dummy function (return 0) hides the fact that modify_port do nothing and it can be wrong for some callers.
I am bit confused. You support the proposal to have a modify_port with some basic check.. right?
Thanks
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html