Re: Deadlock on device removal event for NVMeF target
From: Robert LeBlanc <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-29 16:18:26
Also in:
linux-nvme
Sagi, Thanks for the update. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Sagi Grimberg [off-list ref] wrote:
Hey Robert,quoted
Could something like this be causing the D state problem I was seeing in iSER almost a year ago?No, that is a bug in the mlx5 device as far as I'm concerned (although I couldn't prove it). I've tried to track it down but without access to the FW tools I can't understand what is going on. I've seen this same phenomenon with nvmet-rdma before as well.
Do you know who I could contact about it? I can reproduce the problem pretty easy with two hosts back to back, so it should be easy for someone with mlx5 Eth devices to replicate.
It looks like when we perform QP draining in the presence of rdma operations it may not complete, meaning that the zero-length rdma write never generates a completion. Maybe it has something to do with the qp moving to error state when some rdma operations have not completed.quoted
I tried writing a patch for iSER based on this, but it didn't help. Either the bug is not being triggered in device removal,It's 100% not related to device removal.quoted
or I didn't line up the statuses correctly. But it seems that things are getting stuck in the work queue and some sort of deadlock is happening so I was hopeful that something similar may be in iSER.The hang is the ULP code waiting for QP drain.
Yeah, the patches I wrote did nothing to help the problem. The only thing that kind of worked, was forcing the queue to drop (maybe I was just ignoring the old queue, I can't remember exactly), but it was leaving some stale iSCSI session info around. Now that I've read more of the iSCSI code, I wonder if I should revisit that. I think Bart said that the sledgehammer approach I took should not be necessary. ---------------- Robert LeBlanc PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html