On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:12:17AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
I would. Mainly because it is tied to both the kernel uAPI (via
netlink)and to librdmacm
With what little I know about ibacm I'm inclined to agree. It seems
like a utility for librdmacm, and is consuming a kernel interface.
Reconsider Sean?
(such that librdmacm changes how it builds when ibacm is present, so
if we don't include it, then ibacm becomes a requirement of the
larger package if you want librdmacm to support the ibacm cache
service).
I double checked and I couldn't find anything like
this. librdmacm/src/amc.c builds unconditionally and contains no
ifdefs, configure does not key on anything to do with acm.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html