On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:00:05AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
Do you see any desire of HFI authors to move to new general user API?
A general API requires something general to be implemented first.
That's usually been the problem with driver specific APIs..
Once in a while people try to implement generic concepts drivers
specific, in which case it's easy to redirect them to a generic
subsystem. It's been a while since I look at HFI, but IIRC only
the eeprom bits feel into such an existing categeory. In theory
anything PSM specific could fit into a PSM subsystem, but without
anyone else even looking into that it's hard to define a subsystem
for it. And there's just lots of weird stuff which we'd either
need to reject entirely (too late for HFI now) or live with a driver
specific API.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html