Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2016-07-14

Re: NVMe over RDMA latency

From: Ming Lin <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-13 18:25:32
Also in: linux-nvme

On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 12:49 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
quoted
Hi list,
Hey Ming,
quoted
I'm trying to understand the NVMe over RDMA latency.

Test hardware:
A real NVMe PCI drive on target
Host and target back-to-back connected by Mellanox ConnectX-3

[global]
ioengine=libaio
direct=1
runtime=10
time_based
norandommap
group_reporting

[job1]
filename=/dev/nvme0n1
rw=randread
bs=4k


fio latency data on host side(test nvmeof device)
     slat (usec): min=2, max=213, avg= 6.34, stdev= 3.47
     clat (usec): min=1, max=2470, avg=39.56, stdev=13.04
      lat (usec): min=30, max=2476, avg=46.14, stdev=15.50

fio latency data on target side(test NVMe pci device locally)
     slat (usec): min=1, max=36, avg= 1.92, stdev= 0.42
     clat (usec): min=1, max=68, avg=20.35, stdev= 1.11
      lat (usec): min=19, max=101, avg=22.35, stdev= 1.21

So I picked up this sample from blktrace which seems matches the fio avg latency data.

Host(/dev/nvme0n1)
259,0    0       86     0.015768739  3241  Q   R 1272199648 + 8 [fio]
259,0    0       87     0.015769674  3241  G   R 1272199648 + 8 [fio]
259,0    0       88     0.015771628  3241  U   N [fio] 1
259,0    0       89     0.015771901  3241  I  RS 1272199648 + 8 (    2227) [fio]
259,0    0       90     0.015772863  3241  D  RS 1272199648 + 8 (     962) [fio]
259,0    1       85     0.015819257     0  C  RS 1272199648 + 8 (   46394) [0]

Target(/dev/nvme0n1)
259,0    0      141     0.015675637  2197  Q   R 1272199648 + 8 [kworker/u17:0]
259,0    0      142     0.015676033  2197  G   R 1272199648 + 8 [kworker/u17:0]
259,0    0      143     0.015676915  2197  D  RS 1272199648 + 8 (15676915) [kworker/u17:0]
259,0    0      144     0.015694992     0  C  RS 1272199648 + 8 (   18077) [0]

So host completed IO in about 50usec and target completed IO in about 20usec.
Does that mean the 30usec delta comes from RDMA write(host read means target RDMA write)?

Couple of things that come to mind:

0. Are you using iodepth=1 correct?
I didn't set it. It's 1 by default.
Now I set it.

root@host:~# cat t.job 
[global]
ioengine=libaio
direct=1
runtime=20
time_based
norandommap
group_reporting

[job1]
filename=/dev/nvme0n1
rw=randread
bs=4k
iodepth=1
numjobs=1

1. I imagine you are not polling in the host but rather interrupt
    driven correct? thats a latency source.
It's polling.

root@host:~# cat /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/io_poll 
1
2. the target code is polling if the block device supports it. can you
    confirm that is indeed the case?
Yes.
3. mlx4 has a strong fencing policy for memory registration, which we
    always do. thats a latency source. can you try with
    register_always=0?
root@host:~# cat /sys/module/nvme_rdma/parameters/register_always 
N

4. IRQ affinity assignments. if the sqe is submitted on cpu core X and
    the completion comes to cpu core Y, we will consume some latency
    with the context-switch of waiking up fio on cpu core X. Is this
    a possible case?
Only 1 CPU online on both host and target machine.

root@host:~# lscpu 
Architecture:          x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:            Little Endian
CPU(s):                8
On-line CPU(s) list:   0
Off-line CPU(s) list:  1-7

root@target:~# lscpu 
Architecture:          x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:            Little Endian
CPU(s):                8
On-line CPU(s) list:   0
Off-line CPU(s) list:  1-7

5. What happens if you test against a null_blk (which has a latency of
    < 1us)? back when I ran some tryouts I saw ~10-11us added latency
    from the fabric under similar conditions.
With null_blk on target, latency about 12us.

root@host:~# fio t.job 
job1: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1
fio-2.9-3-g2078c
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [100.0% done] [305.1MB/0KB/0KB /s] [78.4K/0/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s]
job1: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3067: Wed Jul 13 11:20:19 2016
  read : io=6096.9MB, bw=312142KB/s, iops=78035, runt= 20001msec
    slat (usec): min=1, max=207, avg= 2.01, stdev= 0.34
    clat (usec): min=0, max=8020, avg= 9.99, stdev= 9.06
     lat (usec): min=10, max=8022, avg=12.10, stdev= 9.07


With real NVMe device on target, host see latency about 33us.

root@host:~# fio t.job 
job1: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1
fio-2.9-3-g2078c
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [100.0% done] [113.1MB/0KB/0KB /s] [28.1K/0/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s]
job1: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3139: Wed Jul 13 11:22:15 2016
  read : io=2259.5MB, bw=115680KB/s, iops=28920, runt= 20001msec
    slat (usec): min=1, max=195, avg= 2.62, stdev= 1.24
    clat (usec): min=0, max=7962, avg=30.97, stdev=14.50
     lat (usec): min=27, max=7968, avg=33.70, stdev=14.69

And tested NVMe device locally on target, about 23us.
So nvmeof added only about ~10us.

That's nice!

root@target:~# fio t.job 
job1: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1
fio-2.8-26-g603e
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [100.0% done] [161.2MB/0KB/0KB /s] [41.3K/0/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s]
job1: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=2725: Wed Jul 13 11:23:46 2016
  read : io=1605.3MB, bw=164380KB/s, iops=41095, runt= 10000msec
    slat (usec): min=1, max=60, avg= 1.88, stdev= 0.63
    clat (usec): min=1, max=144, avg=21.61, stdev= 8.96
     lat (usec): min=19, max=162, avg=23.59, stdev= 9.00



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help