RE: [PATCH rdma-next 00/29] Soft RoCE driver
From: Hefty, Sean <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-13 15:08:57
To be clear, for what is was designed for, rdmavt is well designed. There was no criticism on this. All I was saying is that SoftRoCe has different needs
Ipath, qib, hfi1, and rxe all need to do a fully software implementation of IB transport. How could they possibly share any code?
�{.n�+�������+%��lzwm��b�맲��r��zX��ݙ�����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v����n�r��6;靫3��\
nnX��f�z��2�ޙ���&�)ߡ�a����
�G���h��j:+v���w�٥