Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2015-06-11

Re: [PATCH for-next V5 10/12] IB/mlx4: Implement ib_device callbacks

From: Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-11 06:31:08

On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:12:13PM +0300, Matan Barak wrote:
+static struct net_device *mlx4_ib_get_netdev(struct ib_device *device, u8 port_num)
+{
This function is never referenced in this patch, so we get compile
warnings?

Warnings are not a huge deal, but you did compile test every patch in
the series??
quoted hunk
+	if (mlx4_is_bonded(ibdev->dev)) {
+		struct net_device *dev;
+		struct net_device *upper = NULL;
So, I see this code in mlx4 touching bonding, but I don't see similar
code in ocrdma..

If bonding is a general feature why is this bit in the driver? Should
the core code be doing this?

Does bonding work in ocrdma at the end of this series? I was expecting
it to..
quoted hunk
+	gid_tbl = mailbox->buf;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MLX4_MAX_PORT_GIDS; ++i)
+		memcpy(&gid_tbl[i], &gids[i].gid, sizeof(union ib_gid));
+
+	err = mlx4_cmd(dev, mailbox->dma,
+		       MLX4_SET_PORT_GID_TABLE << 8 | port_num,
+		       1, MLX4_CMD_SET_PORT, MLX4_CMD_TIME_CLASS_B,
+		       MLX4_CMD_WRAPPED);
+	if (mlx4_is_bonded(dev))
+		err += mlx4_cmd(dev, mailbox->dma,
+				MLX4_SET_PORT_GID_TABLE << 8 | 2,
+				1, MLX4_CMD_SET_PORT, MLX4_CMD_TIME_CLASS_B,
+				MLX4_CMD_WRAPPED);
Again, wonder why the driver is sensitive to bonding, and ocrdma is not..
quoted hunk
@@ -477,11 +673,22 @@ out:
 static int iboe_query_gid(struct ib_device *ibdev, u8 port, int index,
 			  union ib_gid *gid)
 {
-	struct mlx4_ib_dev *dev = to_mdev(ibdev);
+	int ret;
 
-	*gid = dev->iboe.gid_table[port - 1][index];
+	if (!rdma_cap_roce_gid_table(ibdev, port)) {
+		struct mlx4_ib_dev *dev = to_mdev(ibdev);
 
-	return 0;
+		*gid = dev->iboe.gid_table[port - 1][index];
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	ret = ib_get_cached_gid(ibdev, port, index, gid);
+	if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+		memcpy(gid, &zgid, sizeof(*gid));
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
 }
Hum, is it Ok to change iboe_query_gid like this at this point in the
series? Should this be in patch 11?

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help