Re: ibv_req_notify_cq and multithreading
From: Flavio Baronti <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-13 08:10:01
Il 1/12/2012 16:52 PM, Hefty, Sean ha scritto:
quoted
I'm trying to have N threads reading from the same completion channel, bounded to M completion queues. I would like to have N<< M, and to ensure that only a single thread at time can call ibv_poll_cq() on a given queue, to process the events in the same order they were put in the queue. I can't understand how to properly achieve this, since: 1- If I call ibv_req_notify_cq() before ibv_poll_cq(), I might end up with two threads polling the same queue. 2- If I call ibv_req_notify_cq() after ibv_poll_cq(), I could end up with events in the cq not being notified in the channel (I read this on the IBTA 11.4.2.2, and I *think* I actually experienced this under load). I can use option 1 with an additional lock before ibv_req_notify_cq(), but I would like to know if there is a simpler way which I can't see.I can't think of a simpler way. You just don't have any idea which CQ will be returned from the completion channel. Does your traffic pattern work to create N completion channels and distributed the CQs among them? --
Each CQ is related to a separate connection; putting two on the same channel, and making a single thread read the channel, would force an arbitrary coupling between connections which I'm trying to avoid. Point 2 is correct though? ibv_req_notify_cq() should be called before ibv_poll_cq()? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html